Comment by colonelpopcorn
5 years ago
Except it's not easy to follow. Why does kind 15 return a parsed object of kind 5? That's not counting the complexity of each function called, either.
5 years ago
Except it's not easy to follow. Why does kind 15 return a parsed object of kind 5? That's not counting the complexity of each function called, either.
I think they were using the numbers as stand-ins for what would be in reality names be descriptive names (foo, bar, etc.).
Ouch, sorry for the typo. But I'll double down on this: The fact that the typo is so obvious underlines that the structure is easy to review :)