Comment by MattGaiser
4 years ago
I suppose it depends on what you make of Greg's opinion (I am only vaguely familiar with this topic, so I have none).
> They obviously were _NOT_ created by a static analysis tool that is of any intelligence, as they all are the result of totally different patterns, and all of which are obviously not even fixing anything at all. So what am I supposed to think here, other than that you and your group are continuing to experiment on the kernel community developers by sending such nonsense patches?
Greg didn't think that the static analysis excuse could be legitimate as the quality was garbage.
I know this is old, but got a link? That LMKL thread is long