Comment by nikanj
5 years ago
YC is a form of VC, and first and foremost validates "Will this make good returns?", not "Is this legit".
5 years ago
YC is a form of VC, and first and foremost validates "Will this make good returns?", not "Is this legit".
Are you serious? Legitimacy (not being a scam) and ability to execute contribute heavily to successful outcomes. Any VC who invests in every shady startup claiming to become the next Google/FB is gonna go broke
Seems like Theranos, UBeam etc have no trouble raising money, despite every domain expert saying their goals are impossible according to our current understanding of physics
Y Combinator didn't invest in either of these companies. With Theranos, most of the investors weren't VCs. The ones who were were had family/personal connections to Elizabeth Holmes. They've been made to look stupid, and everyone knows if they kept doing deals like that they'd go bust. UBeam had several top VC investors, but they must have been convinced that the original technology demo was legitimate, and that it could be productized and scaled. The skeptics against UBeam only came out later, after they'd already raised their big money. Again, they know if they keep doing deals like that, they'll go bust.
And I suspect many of those early investors in Theranos made a very nice return on that investment, so obviously ignoring the domain experts wasn't such a bad move for them.
1 reply →