Comment by jdc 5 years ago Isn't this a solved problem? Just use a failover, right? 2 comments jdc Reply dilyevsky 5 years ago If your consistency model allows you to use their asynch replication and potentially lose data in surprise switchover - sure. Otherwise you’re looking at similarly worse performance and also worse reliability nice2meetu 5 years ago In our case async replication was acceptable, so we had a failover solution available.
dilyevsky 5 years ago If your consistency model allows you to use their asynch replication and potentially lose data in surprise switchover - sure. Otherwise you’re looking at similarly worse performance and also worse reliability nice2meetu 5 years ago In our case async replication was acceptable, so we had a failover solution available.
nice2meetu 5 years ago In our case async replication was acceptable, so we had a failover solution available.
If your consistency model allows you to use their asynch replication and potentially lose data in surprise switchover - sure. Otherwise you’re looking at similarly worse performance and also worse reliability
In our case async replication was acceptable, so we had a failover solution available.