Comment by dang
4 years ago
> disingenuous
That implies intent to deceive, which crosses into personal attack. Can you please not do that on HN? If you feel that someone else is wrong, it's enough to provide correct information in a neutral way.
4 years ago
> disingenuous
That implies intent to deceive, which crosses into personal attack. Can you please not do that on HN? If you feel that someone else is wrong, it's enough to provide correct information in a neutral way.
Would you prefer hyperbolic?
Sure, that's a much better word to use. It's about what someone is arguing, rather than who or why.