Comment by xyzal
4 years ago
The fact that even the 'smart' people from HN can't wait for their new M1 laptop to arrive convinced me that humans are a lost cause.
4 years ago
The fact that even the 'smart' people from HN can't wait for their new M1 laptop to arrive convinced me that humans are a lost cause.
So, it’s not that other platforms are any better!
Are you sure intel, AMD, Arm or windows TPM aren’t snitching on you? Do we need to make our own silicon from ingot?
There’s no technological solution to this problem, only social and legislative.
Have people already forgotten that Microsoft implemented the tech to routinely scan your cloud storage a decade ago?
>The system that scans cloud drives for illegal images was created by Microsoft and Dartmouth College and donated to NCMEC. The organization creates signatures of the worst known images of child pornography, approximately 16,000 files at present. These file signatures are given to service providers who then try to match them to user files in order to prevent further distribution of the images themselves, a Microsoft spokesperson told NBC News. (Microsoft implemented image-matching technology in its own services, such as Bing and SkyDrive.)
https://www.nbcnews.com/technolog/your-cloud-drive-really-pr...
Didn't the Windows 10 TOS extend that scanning to local storage as well?
I'm OK with software generating signatures from cloud drive images to eliminate child porn pictures and catch pedophiles.
7 replies →
>windows TPM aren’t snitching on you?
The TPM FUD has really gone out of hand.
1. there's no such thing as "windows TPMs", whatever that means.
2. TPMs basically has zero access to the rest of the system. It's connected via a LPC bus, so there's no fancy DMA attacks to pull off. Over that bus the system firmware sends various hashes of the system state (eg. hash of your bootloader), but that's about it.
> 2. TPMs basically has zero access to the rest of the system. It's connected via a LPC bus, so there's no fancy DMA attacks to pull off. Over that bus the system firmware sends various hashes of the system state (eg. hash of your bootloader), but that's about it.
That's the specification. Have you actually monitored the bus using probes? Did you check that the TPM is only connected to LPC?
1 reply →
Is this the real reason why there is the Windows 11 x64 silicon cut-off?
https://www.crowdsupply.com/sutajio-kosagi/precursor
Not too lost 'cause you can run Linux on M1.
Until the manufacturer decides otherwise.
Like every other system since UEFI came out a decade ago. Do you use a Librem phone/laptop yourself?
7 replies →
Then once the manufacturer makes that decision, switch. Honestly this comment is just nonsense.. Apple has always allowed other OSes on Mac. When that changes, buy a new computer.
3 replies →
The selling point of Macs is the Apple ecosystem and UX. If you avoid Apple, what's the point of M1? Linux on equivalent AMDs is cheaper and more compatible.
> If you avoid Apple, what's the point of M1?
Need more?
21 replies →
Wouldn't the M1's power efficiency be applicable on Linux as well?
1 reply →
This is a moot point unless you always verify and check all hardware and software that you use, including communications devices.
You don't need to verify everything yourself. You can verify any small part and rely on the community to verify the rest. Or pay someone to verify. However, for all that you need verifiability, which Apple lacks.
> You can verify any small part and rely on the community to verify the rest. Or pay someone to verify.
The only difference in this is who you trust. Be it Apple, the community or someone you pay, you're still trusting that someone else's interests align with yours and they did things correctly.
In other words, this is not a technical problem. It's a problem that needs to be solved through regulation, because 99% of the people can't verify by themselves that their devices are actually private and secure.
12 replies →
I don’t think that’s his point. The point is Apple made a laptop that did away technologies that allow PC ecosystem/choices we see today. The M1 MacBook feels like an iPhone, but sized as a laptop.
I recently bought an M1 (my first and only Apple product so far). Anecdotally, I only bought it knowing that it can execute arbitrary code without restrictions, unlike iOS. If they decide to change that then you can be sure I won't be purchasing any future models.
I bought the M1 Air and yes, it feels like an iPhone, but sized as a retro-ish laptop and able to run a dev stack which Apple still won't let me do on my plenty powerful enough iPad.
Importantly, it runs iOS games, which has otherwise been a weak point in the macos ecosystem.
AFAIK, the M1 is an ARM laptop and the Linux kernel already supports it. I also assume that it won't be too long until we see Bootcamp for M1 Macs. So I don't think that M1 or Intel changes anything in that regard.
Not at all. Here we have a manufacturer that thinks he would be allowed to scan the contents of your machine. If you scan a machine, you can read everything on the machine.
FYI: M1 Macs can run Linux.
Do you?
What do you recommend instead?
Current generation of desktop/laptop processors are plenty powerful. I’m unconvinced they cannot fulfil today’s computing needs.
As an M1 owner, M1 just does it better for mobile computing purposes. There is no denying this.
1 reply →
The fact that you think people waiting for Intel and Windows 11 are any better off makes me think the same.
"People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people" - Super Hans :)