← Back to context Comment by ekianjo 4 years ago Peer reviews dont mean much anymore these days. 5 comments ekianjo Reply Nevermark 4 years ago Do you have a measure of low correlation to support that?Regardless, I expect reviews are pretty straight forward for a concept that stands on its own like this one. sdoering 4 years ago In answer to sister comment by derbOac:Thanks for sharing this. On the other hand the cited paper clearly relates to interdisciplinary peer review.I am not sure how or if this can be transferred to mathematics. derbOac 4 years ago https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-017-2516-6 malshe 4 years ago Perhaps to you. In academia we take them seriously. nl 4 years ago In Math they really do.
Nevermark 4 years ago Do you have a measure of low correlation to support that?Regardless, I expect reviews are pretty straight forward for a concept that stands on its own like this one. sdoering 4 years ago In answer to sister comment by derbOac:Thanks for sharing this. On the other hand the cited paper clearly relates to interdisciplinary peer review.I am not sure how or if this can be transferred to mathematics. derbOac 4 years ago https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-017-2516-6
sdoering 4 years ago In answer to sister comment by derbOac:Thanks for sharing this. On the other hand the cited paper clearly relates to interdisciplinary peer review.I am not sure how or if this can be transferred to mathematics.
Do you have a measure of low correlation to support that?
Regardless, I expect reviews are pretty straight forward for a concept that stands on its own like this one.
In answer to sister comment by derbOac:
Thanks for sharing this. On the other hand the cited paper clearly relates to interdisciplinary peer review.
I am not sure how or if this can be transferred to mathematics.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-017-2516-6
Perhaps to you. In academia we take them seriously.
In Math they really do.