Comment by avgcorrection 4 years ago Don’t use a fancy tool to implement a simple tool? I’m sure that’s a rule somewhere. 3 comments avgcorrection Reply Dylan16807 4 years ago But also don't use more tools than you need. And good backup isn't notably simpler than a VCS. stavros 4 years ago Ah, I'm of the "whatever gets the job done with the least amount of effort" school. avgcorrection 4 years ago Using libgit2 bindings is the “least amount of effort” to implement periodic backup? And even if it may corrupt your repo?[1][1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29786422
Dylan16807 4 years ago But also don't use more tools than you need. And good backup isn't notably simpler than a VCS.
stavros 4 years ago Ah, I'm of the "whatever gets the job done with the least amount of effort" school. avgcorrection 4 years ago Using libgit2 bindings is the “least amount of effort” to implement periodic backup? And even if it may corrupt your repo?[1][1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29786422
avgcorrection 4 years ago Using libgit2 bindings is the “least amount of effort” to implement periodic backup? And even if it may corrupt your repo?[1][1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29786422
But also don't use more tools than you need. And good backup isn't notably simpler than a VCS.
Ah, I'm of the "whatever gets the job done with the least amount of effort" school.
Using libgit2 bindings is the “least amount of effort” to implement periodic backup? And even if it may corrupt your repo?[1]
[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29786422