Comment by MBCook
4 years ago
If you don’t need a blockchain what makes this web3? I thought that was supposed to be the defining feature.
If it’s just cryptographically signing things we’ve had that ability since PGP came out.
4 years ago
If you don’t need a blockchain what makes this web3? I thought that was supposed to be the defining feature.
If it’s just cryptographically signing things we’ve had that ability since PGP came out.
And we had "independent" SSO schemes based on it, non of which gained widespread adoption (in the "independent" form).
The reason is the UX/UI flow, complexity for integrating them and users which already have it.
So if all people have a wallet at some point which they also can use for SSO that might get adoption.
Through for investment into crypto, instead of "daily using it" you probably don't want a hot walled on your phone.
So as long as "daily/frequent/casual crypto usage" doesn't become a supper common thing for large parts of the society (in the "western" world) it's hard for it to gain wide spread adoption I think.