Comment by aloisdg 4 years ago Indeed. It looks a lot like dotnet's Linq. 2 comments aloisdg Reply cerved 4 years ago wr to linq to sql: the difference is linq works by making objects to tables and dotnet primitives to sql types, often producing really poor queries as a result rswail 4 years ago That's the underlying implementation decision, not necessarily caused by the language syntax/semantics.
cerved 4 years ago wr to linq to sql: the difference is linq works by making objects to tables and dotnet primitives to sql types, often producing really poor queries as a result rswail 4 years ago That's the underlying implementation decision, not necessarily caused by the language syntax/semantics.
rswail 4 years ago That's the underlying implementation decision, not necessarily caused by the language syntax/semantics.
wr to linq to sql: the difference is linq works by making objects to tables and dotnet primitives to sql types, often producing really poor queries as a result
That's the underlying implementation decision, not necessarily caused by the language syntax/semantics.