Comment by gammalost 3 years ago Why? 9 comments gammalost Reply mikece 3 years ago Just a guess, but lack of ability to embed it directly into other software without the technical requirement to then make that whole project GPL3. I suspect the OP would be happier with a BSD/MIT/Apache license. netr0ute 3 years ago That's just the way you make more software open source. If you don't like making your software OSS, then you can take it or leave it. samatman 3 years ago Exactly, a lot of us leave it.I'm fine with my software being OSS, it doesn't have to infect yours.Your license is fine as well, just oil and water is all. 5 replies → stavros 3 years ago Is there an issue with the version? Would v2 be different there?
mikece 3 years ago Just a guess, but lack of ability to embed it directly into other software without the technical requirement to then make that whole project GPL3. I suspect the OP would be happier with a BSD/MIT/Apache license. netr0ute 3 years ago That's just the way you make more software open source. If you don't like making your software OSS, then you can take it or leave it. samatman 3 years ago Exactly, a lot of us leave it.I'm fine with my software being OSS, it doesn't have to infect yours.Your license is fine as well, just oil and water is all. 5 replies → stavros 3 years ago Is there an issue with the version? Would v2 be different there?
netr0ute 3 years ago That's just the way you make more software open source. If you don't like making your software OSS, then you can take it or leave it. samatman 3 years ago Exactly, a lot of us leave it.I'm fine with my software being OSS, it doesn't have to infect yours.Your license is fine as well, just oil and water is all. 5 replies →
samatman 3 years ago Exactly, a lot of us leave it.I'm fine with my software being OSS, it doesn't have to infect yours.Your license is fine as well, just oil and water is all. 5 replies →
Just a guess, but lack of ability to embed it directly into other software without the technical requirement to then make that whole project GPL3. I suspect the OP would be happier with a BSD/MIT/Apache license.
That's just the way you make more software open source. If you don't like making your software OSS, then you can take it or leave it.
Exactly, a lot of us leave it.
I'm fine with my software being OSS, it doesn't have to infect yours.
Your license is fine as well, just oil and water is all.
5 replies →
Is there an issue with the version? Would v2 be different there?