Comment by mikece
3 years ago
Just a guess, but lack of ability to embed it directly into other software without the technical requirement to then make that whole project GPL3. I suspect the OP would be happier with a BSD/MIT/Apache license.
3 years ago
Just a guess, but lack of ability to embed it directly into other software without the technical requirement to then make that whole project GPL3. I suspect the OP would be happier with a BSD/MIT/Apache license.
That's just the way you make more software open source. If you don't like making your software OSS, then you can take it or leave it.
Exactly, a lot of us leave it.
I'm fine with my software being OSS, it doesn't have to infect yours.
Your license is fine as well, just oil and water is all.
What's the most widely used license type when it comes to OSS software?
2 replies →
This is why I usually go for LGPL. Much more sane terms for infection.
1 reply →
Is there an issue with the version? Would v2 be different there?