Comment by ryuta 3 years ago 12 comments ryuta Reply fbanon 3 years ago Lol. Someone is salty they can't make money off of others' work. mxmilkiib 3 years ago One can sell GPL3 licenced software. gammalost 3 years ago Why? mikece 3 years ago Just a guess, but lack of ability to embed it directly into other software without the technical requirement to then make that whole project GPL3. I suspect the OP would be happier with a BSD/MIT/Apache license. netr0ute 3 years ago That's just the way you make more software open source. If you don't like making your software OSS, then you can take it or leave it. 6 replies → stavros 3 years ago Is there an issue with the version? Would v2 be different there?
fbanon 3 years ago Lol. Someone is salty they can't make money off of others' work. mxmilkiib 3 years ago One can sell GPL3 licenced software.
gammalost 3 years ago Why? mikece 3 years ago Just a guess, but lack of ability to embed it directly into other software without the technical requirement to then make that whole project GPL3. I suspect the OP would be happier with a BSD/MIT/Apache license. netr0ute 3 years ago That's just the way you make more software open source. If you don't like making your software OSS, then you can take it or leave it. 6 replies → stavros 3 years ago Is there an issue with the version? Would v2 be different there?
mikece 3 years ago Just a guess, but lack of ability to embed it directly into other software without the technical requirement to then make that whole project GPL3. I suspect the OP would be happier with a BSD/MIT/Apache license. netr0ute 3 years ago That's just the way you make more software open source. If you don't like making your software OSS, then you can take it or leave it. 6 replies → stavros 3 years ago Is there an issue with the version? Would v2 be different there?
netr0ute 3 years ago That's just the way you make more software open source. If you don't like making your software OSS, then you can take it or leave it. 6 replies →
Lol. Someone is salty they can't make money off of others' work.
One can sell GPL3 licenced software.
Why?
Just a guess, but lack of ability to embed it directly into other software without the technical requirement to then make that whole project GPL3. I suspect the OP would be happier with a BSD/MIT/Apache license.
That's just the way you make more software open source. If you don't like making your software OSS, then you can take it or leave it.
6 replies →
Is there an issue with the version? Would v2 be different there?