Comment by fullsend

4 years ago

People who write these articles will talk for an hour straight about their favorite window manager, why it should actually be called Gnu/Linux, or why it’s “free as in beer”.

If you're not someone who can see that one class of window managers makes you much more productive than another, then quite frankly you're probably not a great programmer and just get by with some SO copy-paste, things might not be so good for you once the tech boom busts

  • When I was a TA for computer science the students with tiling window managers had the worst grades in class and talked exactly like this.

  • If your choice of window manager makes a measurable relative difference to your productivity then you are probably not a good programmer.

  • I always thought being able to design code itself was the main way to get productivity. That takes way longer than actually typing the code, and you can do it on a whiteboard / pen and paper. I’ve never used a window manager that affected my productivity in any way.

    I’m fact I’m much more productive since I stopped tweaking my Emacs config and just thought before writing code.

    • That's fair but sometimes there are things I learn iteratively and fast interaction with computers comes really handy there

  • Bro, the amount of time I have wasted trying to rice a wm and fix broken AUR packages only to say screw it and just go back to working on Windows + WSL (well, ubuntu these days, but STOCK ubuntu).

    At the end of the day, the purpose of some things is just to get out of your way.

  • Don't people who think this usually use Emacs and not any window managers?

    • I use vim. This is a bit of a troll, but the baseline feeling is that people who’ve used a tiling window manager (as a group) are probably more interested in computers than people who haven’t.

      1 reply →