Comment by panick21_
3 years ago
> that fact doesn’t seem to be popular.
No its because he question to concept of truth itself. Literally everybody knows history writing is manipulated for many reasons.
But in my observation, however in my view historiography is often far more complex then reflecting simply political desires.
I don't question "concept of truth." Ironically, the truth is corrupted already.
To answer the question "is there any other kind" would be enough to provide one [just one] example of a truthful history book (it is ok if it is imprecise in details as long as it is accurate overall--think physics theories within their application domain--we are far far away from history resembling hard sciences).
The example would demonstrate falsehoods you believe in.