← Back to context Comment by _Algernon_ 4 years ago How can data/files stored on somebody else's computer be subject to 4th amendment rights? 5 comments _Algernon_ Reply wyldfire 4 years ago It seems like any agent holding any property on anyone's behalf should be protected against unreasonable search and seizure. "Their effects"Why would it matter where it's held? runjake 4 years ago Because: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_doctrine judge2020 4 years ago It’s legal for Google to give up user data (under their privacy policy), but the government can’t search them for a user’s data without a warrant. salawat 4 years ago It would certainly be a rolling back of the farce that is Third Party Doctrine. That's for sure.
wyldfire 4 years ago It seems like any agent holding any property on anyone's behalf should be protected against unreasonable search and seizure. "Their effects"Why would it matter where it's held? runjake 4 years ago Because: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_doctrine
judge2020 4 years ago It’s legal for Google to give up user data (under their privacy policy), but the government can’t search them for a user’s data without a warrant.
salawat 4 years ago It would certainly be a rolling back of the farce that is Third Party Doctrine. That's for sure.
It seems like any agent holding any property on anyone's behalf should be protected against unreasonable search and seizure. "Their effects"
Why would it matter where it's held?
Because: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_doctrine
It’s legal for Google to give up user data (under their privacy policy), but the government can’t search them for a user’s data without a warrant.
It would certainly be a rolling back of the farce that is Third Party Doctrine. That's for sure.