Comment by cowtools

4 years ago

>Hate speech in the United States cannot be directly regulated by the government due to the fundamental right to freedom of speech protected by the Constitution. While "hate speech" is not a legal term in the United States, the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that most of what would qualify as hate speech in other western countries is legally protected free speech under the First Amendment.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech_in_the_United_Stat...

There is no government involved here though. If Cloudflare has a hate speech company policy, then as a company they can choose who they serve.

Kiwifarms is free to get another company that aligns with their goals.

I'm having trouble understanding how 1) everyone thinks Cloudflare is the singular hole through which the internet flows and 2) how a private company does not have the freedom to do what they want.

If you don't like what Cloudflare is doing, then speak with your wallet and don't use them, there are numerous other providers of ddos protection

  • >There is no government involved here though.

    See the parent comment I was replying to. We agreed on the statement that "Private companies should not be the de facto moderators of free speech". I just think it is weird to argue this in a thread where we have just turned 180 degrees from our original premise.

[flagged]