Comment by taeric
3 years ago
Role play a policemen and a minority in this form of communication to see an easy way it can fall flat. Disastrously.
3 years ago
Role play a policemen and a minority in this form of communication to see an easy way it can fall flat. Disastrously.
It's already been said plenty of times that mutual trust is a requirement, this will be my last reply to your comments if you keep straw-manning.
It isn't a straw man, though. It literally happens all the time. Role play a woman in an office. And, I should have stated flat out I can see this style can exist. My discourse is why not to lead in with it. Pretty much anywhere.
I think I see what you're saying, and it makes sense. But in a scenario with abusive power dynamics injustice is going to play out the same regardless of preferred conversation style, an outlet will trivially be found.
3 replies →
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court are a fairly formalized interrupt culture in which the justices literally interrupt the attorneys to ask questions, and funny enough, the women justices tend to speak more than the men justices. Clarence Thomas famously speaks the least; he actually would prefer to hear out the attorneys making their case to the court.
5 replies →