Comment by eyelidlessness

> Ah I think I might see what you're getting at here.

Yep! And it’s what the article was getting at too. I probably wouldn’t have been able to articulate it as well without that.

> I think we are talking about two different things.

I could go into the details of the rest of what you said here, but I’m going to yield because we’ve both perfectly demonstrated one another’s points without either intending to do so. :)