Comment by mdp2021

3 years ago

> on the scale of human intellect

Where is the module that produces approximations to true and subtle insights about matters? Where is the "critical thinking" plugin, how is it vetted?

How do you value intelligence: on the form, or on the content? Take two Authors: how do you decide which one is more intelligent?

> the progression of computer chess

?! Those are solvers superseded by different, more effective solvers with a specific goal... These products in context supersede "Eliza"!

12 comments

mdp2021

Reply
jacquesm  3 years ago

Well, for starters we could take your comment and compare it to GPT-3 output to see which one makes more sense.

  • mdp2021  3 years ago

    > compare

    Exactly. Which one "/seems/ to make sense" and which one has the "juice".

    Also: are you insinuating anything? Do you believe your post is appropriate?

    Edit: but very clearly you misunderstood my post: not only as you suggest with your (very avoidable) expression, but also in fact. Because my point implied that "a good intellectual proposal should not happen by chance": modules should be implemented for it. Even if S (for Simplicius) said something doubtful - which is found copiously even in our already "selected" pages -, and engine E constructed something which /reports/ some insight, that would be chancey, random, irrelevant - not the way we are supposed to build things.