Comment by randallsquared
4 years ago
> This is why we rely on the contents of laws rather than our beliefs/feelings about what the contents should have been.
This is called "the letter of the law", and in practice courts do not rely on it.
4 years ago
> This is why we rely on the contents of laws rather than our beliefs/feelings about what the contents should have been.
This is called "the letter of the law", and in practice courts do not rely on it.
In this specific case, do you believe that any of these companies have violated the law in any fashion which is actionable? (whether you call it spirit, text, belief, letter, feelings, or ouija) They appear to be complying with the law in a quite straightforward manner.