Comment by upghost

4 years ago

I’m so bummed that I can’t understand this paper, coming from the lisp camp. Do I need to go to conferences or something to understand this? I read “learn you a Haskell” but this seems to be a bit beyond that. I can’t tell if the concept of “derivative of a type” is an overload of calculus operators (totally fine) and there’s no actual relationship or if this is a serious suggestion of a “derivative”. Huge fan of ADTs, though, great way to write composable code, so if anyone has some insight on how to get some insight, I’d love to hear it!