[1] Disabilities may be broad, but it is incumbent upon our profession(s) to be inclusive.
[2] It is not pointless to work towards including folks who have a disability. More people than you realize have a form of disability. Ensuring our services and products are accessible is important, whether considered under a legal or an ethical lens.
Right yes, agreed with all of that (I’ve been doing we accessibility for over two decades now), I just didn’t get what a US public sector code had to do with my point.
[1] Disabilities may be broad, but it is incumbent upon our profession(s) to be inclusive.
[2] It is not pointless to work towards including folks who have a disability. More people than you realize have a form of disability. Ensuring our services and products are accessible is important, whether considered under a legal or an ethical lens.
Right yes, agreed with all of that (I’ve been doing we accessibility for over two decades now), I just didn’t get what a US public sector code had to do with my point.
> “Disabilities” is an extremely wide spectrum, and it’s pointless to try to group people on that scale.
Ignoring groupings of people who fall under the Disabilities umbrella often can result in lawsuits.