Comment by seydor
2 years ago
This article is like a century behind in rigour ("mind" , really?) and will probably be proven wrong on so many levels that it will become a landmark article in the field. it would be immediately dismissed as irrelevant based on the current state of cognitive science /neuroscience but is here because of the names
My thoughts exactly. Replace language with Go or chess and this could have been written 10/20 years ago.