Comment by nuc1e0n

From my perspective, this is merely an opinion piece without much scientific evidence to back up those opinions. While personally I believe chatGPTs responses aren't particularly novel or reliable, the same can be said for most people as well. Beyond that, the means by which LLMs produce responses don't factor into whether they are considered a success. Chomsky's philosophical views on the matter, while very eloquent and similar to my own, don't add much to the existing discussion on the topic. Something more scientific than him restating his long held and well known views would be nice. Pseudo science only serves to reduce legitimacy of the argument. i.e. stating something is limited "because I say so"