Comment by pessimizer
3 years ago
You're objecting to things that no one in this thread has claimed. You're taking an argument you've had other places and continuing it here.
I watched the testimony, it was accurately characterized by the person you replied to, and it was a good argument for the defense to make.
It was accurate in the sense that the lawyer used the word ai. In context the lawyer said "Apple uses logarithms (sic) and AI to enhance the images. I don't know how that works". The word AI was used but in context the non-technical lawyer simply meant image enhancing algorithms. No one in that room actually discussed AI.
That being said, one could interpret the top comment that way.