Comment by rietta
3 years ago
I am not an expert, but there are rules. If it fits the definition of doing or managing the qualified work and "no one is paying for it" than it could count. This is for the R&D tax credit,see https://www.irs.gov/forms-pubs/about-form-6765.
Here is a copy and paste from a e-mail from our CPA:
To qualify for the credit, you have to have what’s called “Qualified Research”. Qualifying research typically meet’s the following criteria ...
1. Was the research related to the development or improvement of the functionality, quality, reliability or performance of a business component (product, process, software, technique, formula or invention)? 2. Was the development technological in nature? 3. Was there technological uncertainty about either the capability or method of developing the business component or its appropriate design? 4. Was the developmental process experimental in nature?
For wages to qualify for the credit, they have to be for qualifying research activities such as –
1. Conducting or executing the qualified research (e.g., testing a manufacturing prototype) 2. Directly supervising the qualified research (e.g., managing a team of software developers) 3. Directly supporting qualified research (e.g., organizing test results on formulation trials)
I know nothing about this topic, But I think your accountant was talking about R&D tax credits, which is a different topic from R&D capitalisation and depreciation. The tax credits might be another reason why companies previously wanted to claim developers salaries as R&D.
The issue here seems to be that software development wages are now supposed to be treated as R&D per https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35615217
thank you!