Comment by datavirtue

3 years ago

Nothing ever gets shed or revised. The stale regulatory agencies are captured, corrupted, and stale/weak.

OSHA has no teeth (they are just a nuisance to the scofflaws)

FTC is underpowered

EPA needs shut down

FDA is on record for enabling very harmful medical devices

I remember something about Boeing colluding with regulators to put people in harms way.

I could hop on a search engine and dig up a tome-worth of completely unacceptable shit from the last 40 yrs in this regard.

We'd be so much better if there were no environmental rules, wouldn't we? Medical regulation, who needs it?

"Starve the beast" is a political strategy employed by American conservatives to limit government spending by cutting taxes, to deprive the federal government of revenue in a deliberate effort to force it to reduce spending.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starve_the_beast

  • The most dangerous, murderous things in history are powerful central governments. They are like the Ring of Power, everyone thinks they can wield it for good, but it doesn't work out that way.

    • That’s a nice general principle but you didn’t provide evidence of specific harm. I think arguing past each other from first principles is exactly why the US is in this mess in the first place.

      The fact is that all these government agencies are preventing specific harms. Throwing them out because of some vague “big government is bad because it might turn into a tyrrany later” isn’t an argument that the harms being prevented don’t exist. It’s a non-sequitor, like saying the sky is blue when someone complains about airplane noise.

    • Powerful and authoritarian are two different things. I want a powerful but democratically controlled via popular vote government.

      Power abhors a vacuum. I would rather that power be in the hands of the citizen votes.

  • And what does spending indicate. Has the beast been starved?

    • I dont live in USA so I dont know. But here the ruling party is losing in local elections in town, so they cut the amount of taxes aplocated to muncipialities while at the same time they ask them to deal with more issues. So muncipialities are forced to degrade the quality of their services - since they dont have enough money. Then the ruling party claims that the local politicians cannot rule properly. What is just a lie. But this lie works.

      1 reply →