Comment by shakna 3 years ago Well, they do both use PDF.js [0].[0] https://mozilla.github.io/pdf.js/ 4 comments shakna Reply TeMPOraL 3 years ago Using that knowledge we can improve on the instructions upthread.Just open this link: https://weber.mizecx.com/knowledge/s3/retrieve?path=knowledg...which is the original link, with "#page=65" appended. At least on Firefox, it will lead you straight to the page in question. ghusbands 3 years ago Chrome uses PDFium [1], not PDF.js.[1] https://github.com/chromium/pdfium yakubin 3 years ago Which is significantly snappier than pdf.js on big and moderately-sized PDFs. capableweb 3 years ago Might be, although the UI is certainly different, at least for me on Windows. The page numbers are in the top-left on Firefox but top-center on Chrome.
TeMPOraL 3 years ago Using that knowledge we can improve on the instructions upthread.Just open this link: https://weber.mizecx.com/knowledge/s3/retrieve?path=knowledg...which is the original link, with "#page=65" appended. At least on Firefox, it will lead you straight to the page in question.
ghusbands 3 years ago Chrome uses PDFium [1], not PDF.js.[1] https://github.com/chromium/pdfium yakubin 3 years ago Which is significantly snappier than pdf.js on big and moderately-sized PDFs.
capableweb 3 years ago Might be, although the UI is certainly different, at least for me on Windows. The page numbers are in the top-left on Firefox but top-center on Chrome.
Using that knowledge we can improve on the instructions upthread.
Just open this link: https://weber.mizecx.com/knowledge/s3/retrieve?path=knowledg...
which is the original link, with "#page=65" appended. At least on Firefox, it will lead you straight to the page in question.
Chrome uses PDFium [1], not PDF.js.
[1] https://github.com/chromium/pdfium
Which is significantly snappier than pdf.js on big and moderately-sized PDFs.
Might be, although the UI is certainly different, at least for me on Windows. The page numbers are in the top-left on Firefox but top-center on Chrome.