You quoted evidence without providing any, and conflate evidence with belief. That also doesn't really add anything to the conversation.
The smart money says 'there is no afterlife, so use what you've got'. If you - or anybody else - is so sure that an afterlife exists then it would be nice to present some actual proof and absent that to admit that you're making it up or that it's hearsay.
No, I think they made that up because they fell for the exact same trap as most other religions did: a desire to explain that which they didn't know anything about. They obviously didn't do it 'just for show' so I'm not sure why you would make it seem like I was thinking that.
Religions are several thing: power structures, coping mechanisms, focal points for social functions, explanatory mechanisms, scams and stories (origin myths etc) all rolled into one. Depending on which religion you are looking at one or more of these traits may be more dominant.
Every religion lays claim to some unique knowledge and tries to explain a lot more than they can and as a result they are - to me comically - incapable of adjusting to knowledge as it became available. The result is dogma, in one form or another.
You quoted evidence without providing any, and conflate evidence with belief. That also doesn't really add anything to the conversation.
The smart money says 'there is no afterlife, so use what you've got'. If you - or anybody else - is so sure that an afterlife exists then it would be nice to present some actual proof and absent that to admit that you're making it up or that it's hearsay.
The smart money? Do you think that Buddhists make up the whole idea of succession just for show?
No, I think they made that up because they fell for the exact same trap as most other religions did: a desire to explain that which they didn't know anything about. They obviously didn't do it 'just for show' so I'm not sure why you would make it seem like I was thinking that.
Religions are several thing: power structures, coping mechanisms, focal points for social functions, explanatory mechanisms, scams and stories (origin myths etc) all rolled into one. Depending on which religion you are looking at one or more of these traits may be more dominant.
Every religion lays claim to some unique knowledge and tries to explain a lot more than they can and as a result they are - to me comically - incapable of adjusting to knowledge as it became available. The result is dogma, in one form or another.
3 replies →