Comment by ghusbands 2 years ago Do you have reason to believe that tinyGo would do better on that particular benchmark? 1 comment ghusbands Reply csjh 2 years ago Based on the name, I’d imagine part of TinyGo’s raison d`être would be a smaller binary size. Plus, seems optimized for speed rather than speed-of-compiler
csjh 2 years ago Based on the name, I’d imagine part of TinyGo’s raison d`être would be a smaller binary size. Plus, seems optimized for speed rather than speed-of-compiler
Based on the name, I’d imagine part of TinyGo’s raison d`être would be a smaller binary size. Plus, seems optimized for speed rather than speed-of-compiler