Comment by ledauphin

2 years ago

I disagree - allowing for type inference on the closures will make for a much more pleasant language, whereas requiring type annotations on top level functions makes sense for lots of reasons.

3 comments

ledauphin

Reply
troupo  2 years ago

> allowing for type inference on the closures

You can still have your type inference without forcing the unnecessary requirement that local functions be `fn` while top functions be `func`.

  • andrewcobby  2 years ago

    I agree with this, I'm designing a similar language and have gone with this approach. Same syntax for all functions, but top-level functions require explicit type annotations (purely for documentation/sanity more so than a technical requirement).

  • ledauphin  2 years ago

    agreed, but there's still differentiation in syntax, and I was responding to someone asking for no differentiation.