Comment by pwdisswordfishc 2 years ago Typical example: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37293919 16 comments pwdisswordfishc Reply amedvednikov 2 years ago > If you've been dreaming about a language like this, give it a try. Spend 20 minutes on it, and form your opinion.> I'm sure you'll like it!And what's wrong with this comment? lifthrasiir 2 years ago > There are no false or misleading claims, only in the articles from authors who say "V must die".I'd like you to elaborate on this instead. Were there many articles with explicit death threats? amedvednikov 2 years ago You consider the phrase "[lang] must die" a death threat?Only the author of the vaporware articles said that, AFAIK. 10 replies → richbell 2 years ago > > If you've been dreaming about a language like this, give it a try. Spend 20 minutes on it, and form your opinion.> > I'm sure you'll like it!> And what's wrong with this comment?It's interesting how you deliberately avoided quoting part of the comment. One could potentially interpret that as you being deliberately misleading. amedvednikov 2 years ago And what's wrong with the first part of the comment? 1 reply →
amedvednikov 2 years ago > If you've been dreaming about a language like this, give it a try. Spend 20 minutes on it, and form your opinion.> I'm sure you'll like it!And what's wrong with this comment? lifthrasiir 2 years ago > There are no false or misleading claims, only in the articles from authors who say "V must die".I'd like you to elaborate on this instead. Were there many articles with explicit death threats? amedvednikov 2 years ago You consider the phrase "[lang] must die" a death threat?Only the author of the vaporware articles said that, AFAIK. 10 replies → richbell 2 years ago > > If you've been dreaming about a language like this, give it a try. Spend 20 minutes on it, and form your opinion.> > I'm sure you'll like it!> And what's wrong with this comment?It's interesting how you deliberately avoided quoting part of the comment. One could potentially interpret that as you being deliberately misleading. amedvednikov 2 years ago And what's wrong with the first part of the comment? 1 reply →
lifthrasiir 2 years ago > There are no false or misleading claims, only in the articles from authors who say "V must die".I'd like you to elaborate on this instead. Were there many articles with explicit death threats? amedvednikov 2 years ago You consider the phrase "[lang] must die" a death threat?Only the author of the vaporware articles said that, AFAIK. 10 replies →
amedvednikov 2 years ago You consider the phrase "[lang] must die" a death threat?Only the author of the vaporware articles said that, AFAIK. 10 replies →
richbell 2 years ago > > If you've been dreaming about a language like this, give it a try. Spend 20 minutes on it, and form your opinion.> > I'm sure you'll like it!> And what's wrong with this comment?It's interesting how you deliberately avoided quoting part of the comment. One could potentially interpret that as you being deliberately misleading. amedvednikov 2 years ago And what's wrong with the first part of the comment? 1 reply →
> If you've been dreaming about a language like this, give it a try. Spend 20 minutes on it, and form your opinion.
> I'm sure you'll like it!
And what's wrong with this comment?
> There are no false or misleading claims, only in the articles from authors who say "V must die".
I'd like you to elaborate on this instead. Were there many articles with explicit death threats?
You consider the phrase "[lang] must die" a death threat?
Only the author of the vaporware articles said that, AFAIK.
10 replies →
> > If you've been dreaming about a language like this, give it a try. Spend 20 minutes on it, and form your opinion.
> > I'm sure you'll like it!
> And what's wrong with this comment?
It's interesting how you deliberately avoided quoting part of the comment. One could potentially interpret that as you being deliberately misleading.
And what's wrong with the first part of the comment?
1 reply →