Comment by pjmlp 3 years ago Just like using JMS, MSMQ or similar queues, I fail to see what is so great about it. 5 comments pjmlp Reply latchkey 3 years ago JMS is a specification, not an implementation. pjmlp 3 years ago Playing pedantic? latchkey 3 years ago Ok, if you can't see what is so great about it, then I'd suggest spending some time in the GCP documentation to figure it out. 2 replies →
latchkey 3 years ago JMS is a specification, not an implementation. pjmlp 3 years ago Playing pedantic? latchkey 3 years ago Ok, if you can't see what is so great about it, then I'd suggest spending some time in the GCP documentation to figure it out. 2 replies →
pjmlp 3 years ago Playing pedantic? latchkey 3 years ago Ok, if you can't see what is so great about it, then I'd suggest spending some time in the GCP documentation to figure it out. 2 replies →
latchkey 3 years ago Ok, if you can't see what is so great about it, then I'd suggest spending some time in the GCP documentation to figure it out. 2 replies →
JMS is a specification, not an implementation.
Playing pedantic?
Ok, if you can't see what is so great about it, then I'd suggest spending some time in the GCP documentation to figure it out.
2 replies →