Comment by diath 1 year ago This seems to be contradicting your claim: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8451678/ 3 comments diath Reply civilitty 1 year ago Did you read the study? Or even the first line of the abstract? “Hypogonadal men with hepatic steatosis” is literally in the first sentence.It’s a study on men with low testosterone and fatty liver disease. They already have damaged livers. diath 1 year ago If the presence of testosterone can improve the function of damaged liver, there's no reason to think that a healthy liver would get damaged by it. I can't even think of any mechanism that would be involved. eimrine 1 year ago dosis sola facit venenum? Sorry I can not say anything smarter because I can not compare the doses, but maybe someone else will compare.
civilitty 1 year ago Did you read the study? Or even the first line of the abstract? “Hypogonadal men with hepatic steatosis” is literally in the first sentence.It’s a study on men with low testosterone and fatty liver disease. They already have damaged livers. diath 1 year ago If the presence of testosterone can improve the function of damaged liver, there's no reason to think that a healthy liver would get damaged by it. I can't even think of any mechanism that would be involved. eimrine 1 year ago dosis sola facit venenum? Sorry I can not say anything smarter because I can not compare the doses, but maybe someone else will compare.
diath 1 year ago If the presence of testosterone can improve the function of damaged liver, there's no reason to think that a healthy liver would get damaged by it. I can't even think of any mechanism that would be involved. eimrine 1 year ago dosis sola facit venenum? Sorry I can not say anything smarter because I can not compare the doses, but maybe someone else will compare.
eimrine 1 year ago dosis sola facit venenum? Sorry I can not say anything smarter because I can not compare the doses, but maybe someone else will compare.
Did you read the study? Or even the first line of the abstract? “Hypogonadal men with hepatic steatosis” is literally in the first sentence.
It’s a study on men with low testosterone and fatty liver disease. They already have damaged livers.
If the presence of testosterone can improve the function of damaged liver, there's no reason to think that a healthy liver would get damaged by it. I can't even think of any mechanism that would be involved.
dosis sola facit venenum? Sorry I can not say anything smarter because I can not compare the doses, but maybe someone else will compare.