Comment by janosdebugs 3 years ago If that were the case, they wouldn't have seen weird connectivity issues/behaviors. 2 comments janosdebugs Reply vb-8448 3 years ago why not? They discover the issue only because the attacker failed to renew the certificates. janosdebugs 3 years ago Yeah, but just getting a hold of a valid certificate doesn't automatically mean a MITM. For that the network connections need to be intercepted too.
vb-8448 3 years ago why not? They discover the issue only because the attacker failed to renew the certificates. janosdebugs 3 years ago Yeah, but just getting a hold of a valid certificate doesn't automatically mean a MITM. For that the network connections need to be intercepted too.
janosdebugs 3 years ago Yeah, but just getting a hold of a valid certificate doesn't automatically mean a MITM. For that the network connections need to be intercepted too.
why not? They discover the issue only because the attacker failed to renew the certificates.
Yeah, but just getting a hold of a valid certificate doesn't automatically mean a MITM. For that the network connections need to be intercepted too.