Comment by saagarjha 2 years ago Code that uses syscalls that aren’t in libc but doesn’t want to have to drop to inline assembly? 3 comments saagarjha Reply pizlonator 2 years ago Right, so exploits. saagarjha 2 years ago Exploits are more than happy to drop to inline assembly. pizlonator 2 years ago Theo already prevented you from making the syscall by using the trap instruction directly because of in kernel checking that you got to the kernel via the right point in libc.
pizlonator 2 years ago Right, so exploits. saagarjha 2 years ago Exploits are more than happy to drop to inline assembly. pizlonator 2 years ago Theo already prevented you from making the syscall by using the trap instruction directly because of in kernel checking that you got to the kernel via the right point in libc.
saagarjha 2 years ago Exploits are more than happy to drop to inline assembly. pizlonator 2 years ago Theo already prevented you from making the syscall by using the trap instruction directly because of in kernel checking that you got to the kernel via the right point in libc.
pizlonator 2 years ago Theo already prevented you from making the syscall by using the trap instruction directly because of in kernel checking that you got to the kernel via the right point in libc.
Right, so exploits.
Exploits are more than happy to drop to inline assembly.
Theo already prevented you from making the syscall by using the trap instruction directly because of in kernel checking that you got to the kernel via the right point in libc.