Comment by dicytea
2 years ago
> Guix, Archlinux, Debian do the binary reproducibility better than Nix / NixOS / Nixpkgs.
Huh, didn't know that Arch Linux tests reproducibility. It's apparently 85.6% reproducible: https://reproducible.archlinux.org
I wonder how much work would be needed for NixOS, considering it has more than 80k packages in the official repository.
I think that's also a bit of an unfair comparison given the number of AUR packages you usually use on Arch. With nixpkgs there isn't a distinction between official and community packages.
Sure there is, the NUR has a few thousand community packages that are not ready for release
The nixpkgs are all official packages, it's just really easy to become a maintainer (you make a pull request adding the package you want to maintain)
I'm just saying that X% of arch official packages being reproducible isn't a complete statistic when many day to day things are in AUR, most of which are in nixpkgs not NUR.
1 reply →