Nobody asked if he was “deeply involved.” Nobody is even contesting that he acted illegally. Solely that he was a war criminal, which has a specific legal meaning.
War criminal is the new RICO. Except the latter doesn’t lose legitimacy when the public mis-uses it.
Nobody asked if he was “deeply involved.” Nobody is even contesting that he acted illegally. Solely that he was a war criminal, which has a specific legal meaning.
War criminal is the new RICO. Except the latter doesn’t lose legitimacy when the public mis-uses it.