Or applying for a job, or surveying local businesses for a story, or transposed the numbers, or…
It can simultaneously be true that metadata contains less information than real data and that metadata is still dangerous. But when one is known for breathless hyperbole, should we be surprised when that’s what we get?
Or applying for a job, or surveying local businesses for a story, or transposed the numbers, or…
It can simultaneously be true that metadata contains less information than real data and that metadata is still dangerous. But when one is known for breathless hyperbole, should we be surprised when that’s what we get?
Yeah, false positives are a doozy, and I don't see many guardrails in place to prevent the intelligence community from acting upon them :/
> doozy
They’re not just a “doozy” they’re downright fascist authoritarian. Even the positive positives are infringements.