Comment by ACS_Solver
2 years ago
To quote Gemini, what the quack! Even with the understanding that these are handpicked interactions that are likely to be among the system's best responses, that is an extremely impressive level of understanding and reasoning.
Calls for a new corollary to Clarke's Third Law. "Any sufficiently-advanced rigged demo is indistinguishable from magic."
Magic Leap!
And for the development team it's predicated upon Hoffsteader's Law.
Does it really need to have affectations like "What the quack!"? These affectations are lab grown and not cute.
I guess it's like drawing googly eyes on clippy: it helps sell the illusion that you are interacting with something alive instead of an automatic system.
Except that it doesn't.
I liked them
You missed the joke! Look at their username ;)
1 reply →
> These affectations are lab grown and not cute
Unless it was put in there manually, it's emergent, isn't it?
Or something along those lines in the original prompt.
Reminds me of their demo a few years back when they had AI call a hair salon to schedule an appointment. When the receptionist asked if they could put the caller on hold, it did the "mmm hmm" that was uncannily human like
1 reply →
If it were emergent it would say WTF.
What would be Gemini's current IQ? I would suspect it's higher than the average human's.
GPT 4 already scored higher than 95% of people. The average human isn't really all that smart.
On knowledge tests for sure. It completely falls short on common sense in which it's worse than almost anyone.
3 replies →
The average human is not trained to be smart. They are trained to earn money, provide for family and navigate social situations.