← Back to context

Comment by htk

2 years ago

The whole Gemini webpage and contents felt weird to me, it's in the uncanny valley of trying to look and feel like an Apple marketing piece. The hyperbolic language, surgically precise ethnic/gender diversity, unnecessary animations and the sales pitch from the CEO felt like a small player in the field trying to pass as a big one.

It's funny because now the OpenAI keynote feels like it's emulating the Google keynotes from 5 years ago.

Google Keynote feels like it's emulating the Apple keynote from 5 years ago.

And the Apple keynote looks like robots just out of an uncanny valley pretending to be humans - just like keynotes might look in 5 years, but actually made by AI. Apple is always ahead of the curve in keynote trends.

  • You know those memes where AI keeps escalating a theme to more extreme levels with each request?

    That's what Apple keynotes feel like now. It seems like each year, they're trying to make their presentations even more essentially 'Apple.' They crossed the uncanny valley a long time ago.

  • I hadn’t thought about it until just now, but the most recent Apple events really are the closest real-person thing I’ve ever seen to some of the “good” computer generated photorealistic (kinda…) humans “reading” with text-to-speech that I’ve seen.

    It’s the stillness between “beats” that does it, I think, and the very-constrained and repetitive motion.

    • Is there such a concept as a “reverse uncanny valley”??

      Where humans behave so awkwardly that they seem artificial but are just not quite close enough…

      If so, Apple have totally nailed the reverse uncanny valley!

    • Hmm. Like the "NPC fetish" stuff that was going around for a brief minute?

I got the same vibes. Ultra and Pro. It feels tacky that it declares the "Gemini era" before it's even available. Google really want to be seen as level on the playing field.

I’m imagining the project managers are patting themselves on the back for checking all the performative boxes, blind to the absolute satire of it all.

> surgically precise ethnic/gender diversity

What does that mean and why is it bad?

Diversity in marketing is used because, well, your desired market is diverse.

I don't know what it means for it to be surgically precise, though.

  • I imagine the commenter was calling out what they perceived to be an inauthentic yet carefully planned facade of diversity. This marketing trend rubs me the wrong way as well, because it reminds me of how I was raised and educated as a 90s kid to believe that racism was a thing of the past. That turned out to be a damaging lie.

    I don't mean to imply that companies should avoid displays of diversity, I just mean that it's obvious when it's inauthentic. Virtue signaling in exchange for business is not progress.

    • It think it could be a seen as a good thing, it's a little chicken and egg. If you want to increase diversity at a company, one good way would be to represent diversity in your keynotes in order to make it look to a diverse base that they would be happy working there, thus increasing the diversity at the company.

  • It's bad if the makeup of the company doesn't reflect the diversity seen in the marketing, because it doesn't reflect any genuine value and is just for show.

    Now, I don't know how diverse the AI workforce is at Google, but the YT thumbnails show precisely 50% of white men. Maybe that's what the parent meant by "surgically precise".

  • Agreed with your comment. This is every marketing department on the planet right now, and it's not a bad thing IMO. Can feel a bit forced at times, but it's better than the alternative.

  • Of course to normal people, this just seems like another Google keynote. If OP is counting the number of white people, maybe they're the weird one here.