No, when capital coordinates people get worried and rightfully so. There are a lot of non Jewish Zionists, just as there are a lot of Jewish non-Zionists. In our industry, the VCs are overwhelmingly Zionist while the rest of the industry is non-Zionist and it's the Zionists that are getting people fired and blacklisted.
There are ample articles in reputable publications like the financial times discussing how pro-israel many of the country's business leaders are. Many of these people are going out of their way to blacklist students who have publicly expressed pro-palestinian views from positions at prestigious law firms (and to be fair, some of those comments were very incindiery). But many of them have gone further, threatening universities who don't kick pro-palestinian groups off campus with pulled donations.
Israel also notably has close ties with the American business community, with some calling them "start up nation".
This article is not about Jews co-ordinating, it's about foreign govt agents in military uniforms coordinating with powerful sillicon valley leaders to punish, among other things, American citizens for holding wrong-think.
I legitimately don't understand what you're trying to imply. As far as I can tell it's a very indirect attempt to imply that people "having a nerve struck" over "Jews coordinating", are bad in a nonspecific way. Can you state more clearly what you mean so I can consider it?
Not the op, but "Jews secretly controlling xxx" where xxx is finance, the news, etc is a common, and very antisemitic, meme.
I think the article is probably just pro Palestinian, but the fact that it's examining only propaganda on one side and not the other, even though there will be the same kind of operation on both sides because there always is, make s me also a bit suspicious of it.
I hear what you're saying, thank you for clarifying for op. I think there is a logical jump from coordinating to controlling in this instance. The article doesn't say "The Jews control the media", but rather "Here are documented instances of pro-Israeli people in positions of power coordinating to do X Y or Z".
I can understand that it might seem like an attack on Israel itself, and that an attack on Israel might actually be the intended purpose of the reporting, but it's hard for me to prioritize that over the importance of honest reporting of this sort. It's journalism that is informative and relevant, and that seems to be angering powerful people. I would like a companion peace on the propaganda war from "the other side", but this is the only one available to me at the moment. Fostering an environment in which this sort of journalism can safely be done is critical.
It's very unfair to say that the reaction to this is because of "the Jews" and not because a close US ally who has much of the support of its military and intelligence apparatus at its disposal is doing this.
No, when capital coordinates people get worried and rightfully so. There are a lot of non Jewish Zionists, just as there are a lot of Jewish non-Zionists. In our industry, the VCs are overwhelmingly Zionist while the rest of the industry is non-Zionist and it's the Zionists that are getting people fired and blacklisted.
[flagged]
There are ample articles in reputable publications like the financial times discussing how pro-israel many of the country's business leaders are. Many of these people are going out of their way to blacklist students who have publicly expressed pro-palestinian views from positions at prestigious law firms (and to be fair, some of those comments were very incindiery). But many of them have gone further, threatening universities who don't kick pro-palestinian groups off campus with pulled donations.
Israel also notably has close ties with the American business community, with some calling them "start up nation".
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2023/10/11/business/harvard-israel-h...
https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1733146138226614465
Plenty of examples wrapped up in a short well sourced tweet. Enjoy.
This article is not about Jews co-ordinating, it's about foreign govt agents in military uniforms coordinating with powerful sillicon valley leaders to punish, among other things, American citizens for holding wrong-think.
I legitimately don't understand what you're trying to imply. As far as I can tell it's a very indirect attempt to imply that people "having a nerve struck" over "Jews coordinating", are bad in a nonspecific way. Can you state more clearly what you mean so I can consider it?
Not the op, but "Jews secretly controlling xxx" where xxx is finance, the news, etc is a common, and very antisemitic, meme.
I think the article is probably just pro Palestinian, but the fact that it's examining only propaganda on one side and not the other, even though there will be the same kind of operation on both sides because there always is, make s me also a bit suspicious of it.
I hear what you're saying, thank you for clarifying for op. I think there is a logical jump from coordinating to controlling in this instance. The article doesn't say "The Jews control the media", but rather "Here are documented instances of pro-Israeli people in positions of power coordinating to do X Y or Z".
I can understand that it might seem like an attack on Israel itself, and that an attack on Israel might actually be the intended purpose of the reporting, but it's hard for me to prioritize that over the importance of honest reporting of this sort. It's journalism that is informative and relevant, and that seems to be angering powerful people. I would like a companion peace on the propaganda war from "the other side", but this is the only one available to me at the moment. Fostering an environment in which this sort of journalism can safely be done is critical.
It's very unfair to say that the reaction to this is because of "the Jews" and not because a close US ally who has much of the support of its military and intelligence apparatus at its disposal is doing this.