Comment by dml2135
2 years ago
Why is saying Israeli should not be a Jewish state any different than saying the US should not be a Christian state?
2 years ago
Why is saying Israeli should not be a Jewish state any different than saying the US should not be a Christian state?
Well Jews are a cultural and ethnic group as well; so saying Israel shouldn’t be a Jewish state is similar to saying Japan shouldn’t be a Japanese state. It was explicitly established to create (or some would say reclaimed) a Jewish homeland. It’s Jewishness is central to it’s raison d'être.
I’m not completely bought into your comparison, but running with it for a second — If one were to challenge the notion that the Japanese state should privilege ethnic Japanese over other people living in its borders, no I would not consider that position to be “anti-Japanese”.
Similarly, I don’t understand is how expressing the personal view that all of the people living in the territory of Israel — Jews and non-Jews alike — would be better off living in a secular state, is somehow akin to anti-semitism.
Japan isn't an officially Shinto state, afaik. And it wouldn't be wrong to criticize its subjugation of the indigenous Ainu people. I think that calling for a multi-ethnic, secular Japanese state is fair.
Japan isn’t officially a Japanese country?
Come on mate, thats possibly the most asinine and distasteful argument I have seen on this site.
3 replies →
So wouldn't saying that Israel shouldn't be a Jewish state then be similar to saying that the United States shouldn't be a white state?
The USA is a bad example because it does not have a basic ethnic group. A good parallel would be: "France should not be a French state" or "Ireland should not be an Irish state" or again "Japan should not be a Japanese state."
2 replies →