Comment by tokai
3 years ago
I can't read the japanese text but the "with the intent of business interference" makes it seems like could be about harming a competitor, and not for running your family photos through nightshade before uploading them.
3 years ago
I can't read the japanese text but the "with the intent of business interference" makes it seems like could be about harming a competitor, and not for running your family photos through nightshade before uploading them.
“Business interference” and “harming a competitor” are awfully vague, though. Who’s considered a competitor? Is it “business interference” for example to protect one’s character designs with Nightshade, with the tool serving as a sort of compliment to copyright protection that can be enforced without court involvement? What about using it with landscape stock photography as an AI-proof counterpart to visual watermarking?
For sure it is vague. But there is already law covering illegal business practices and competition. Without understanding Japanese its hard to say if its under that umbrella, which might make it not vague at all.