Comment by jsjohnst
2 years ago
Ahem, you mean you have a single example, from a decade ago, one where Apple was hardly a key player (hence why Apple didn’t sign onto PRISM until half a decade after Yahoo, Microsoft, Google, et all), as conclusive evidence of “eagerness to partner with spy agencies”, despite numerous public cases where they’ve done the opposite… got it!
That makes sense, would you agree to the revised statement:
"We already know Apple cooperated with the spy agencies behind the publics back"?
No, I won’t agree to context free blanket statements which are specifically worded to imply something which is simply not provably true, especially given evidence to the opposite. If you knew anything about PRISM at all, even the technical details publicly available with the minimalist of effort on your part, you wouldn’t be asking.
The struggle itself is a clue, nobody takes time out of their day to defend Apple and PRISM on the Internet. Opsec needs enhancement.
1 reply →