It's not, and maybe my comment was unclear. My comment was about the Ghost managed hosting service and its competitors. It's just a little strange that Substack is blamed for allowing medical misinformation on a thread praising its competitor, when that competitor also allows medical misinformation.
All I'm saying is that when judging the policies of these companies, we should apply a consistent standard.
There is a consistant standard from Molly and others who have left (like Casey Newton) It has to do with social tools. Substack puts out a weekly email digest and has a notes platform where your articles can be next to the nazi articles by substacks algo. Ghost doesnt push social and isnt interested in getting into that space.
How is that relevant to selfhosting the software that Ghost provides under an MIT license?
It's not, and maybe my comment was unclear. My comment was about the Ghost managed hosting service and its competitors. It's just a little strange that Substack is blamed for allowing medical misinformation on a thread praising its competitor, when that competitor also allows medical misinformation.
All I'm saying is that when judging the policies of these companies, we should apply a consistent standard.
There is a consistant standard from Molly and others who have left (like Casey Newton) It has to do with social tools. Substack puts out a weekly email digest and has a notes platform where your articles can be next to the nazi articles by substacks algo. Ghost doesnt push social and isnt interested in getting into that space.