Comment by jacquesm
2 years ago
A crime of passion does not normally include studying up on body removal, ways to hide further evidence and not owning up to the crime for years because you - wrongly - believe that you can't be convicted if the body can't be found. This was premeditated murder, not a crime of passion.
Premeditation means planning it beforehand.
The books were purchased after the deed was done.
A crime of passion can be covered up without making it premeditated.
I'm not going to split legal hairs here, merely point out that 'sudden strong impulse' (a requirement for 'crime passionel') is incompatible with subsequent testimony by Reiser claiming that he had 'killed their mother to protect his children'.
That's one of the problems with all of the Reiser defenders: they are usually unaware to what degree Reiser has incriminated himself.
I take offense at being called a "Reiser defender". I think we can all agree that he's a creep, a manipulator, and a murderer. I don't hear anyone defending him.
The guy strangled his wife. I don't think that's the kind of thing you premeditate. He's also a liar; I wouldn't read too much into his attempt to manipulate his later civil jury. The crime-of-passion narrative would still find for the plaintiff, so he made up some nonsense that the jury saw right through.
Those things happened after the murder, and don't necessarily preclude a crime of passion. When someone does commit a crime of passion, they don't always just come out and confess as soon as they're clear headed again.
Reisers' own evidence precludes a crime of passion.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/software-guru-ordered-pay...
What part of that article supports your point? The only thing I see there is that he made up multiple different stories to try to explain her absence.
1 reply →