Comment by krapp

3 years ago

The reason people are arguing against this technology is that no one is using them in the way you describe. They actually wouldn't even be economically viable in that case.

If it is not economically viable for you to be ethical, then you do not deserve economic success.

Anyone arguing against this technology following the line of reasoning you present is operating in adverse to the good of society. Especially if their only motive is economic viability.

  • I feel like you read my comment and interpreted it in exactly the opposite way it was intended because I agree with you, and you're making the same point I was trying to make.