Comment by smoothjazz 1 year ago [removed] 5 comments smoothjazz Reply bawolff 1 year ago No, that was from south africa's request. That wasn't the wording the court used in its decision smoothjazz 1 year ago [removed] bawolff 1 year ago Do you mean from page 2? Because that is the court just saying what each side requested. The actual order that the court gave is much later in the document. 1 reply → layer8 1 year ago Please see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39146853.
bawolff 1 year ago No, that was from south africa's request. That wasn't the wording the court used in its decision smoothjazz 1 year ago [removed] bawolff 1 year ago Do you mean from page 2? Because that is the court just saying what each side requested. The actual order that the court gave is much later in the document. 1 reply → layer8 1 year ago Please see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39146853.
smoothjazz 1 year ago [removed] bawolff 1 year ago Do you mean from page 2? Because that is the court just saying what each side requested. The actual order that the court gave is much later in the document. 1 reply → layer8 1 year ago Please see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39146853.
bawolff 1 year ago Do you mean from page 2? Because that is the court just saying what each side requested. The actual order that the court gave is much later in the document. 1 reply →
No, that was from south africa's request. That wasn't the wording the court used in its decision
[removed]
Do you mean from page 2? Because that is the court just saying what each side requested. The actual order that the court gave is much later in the document.
1 reply →
Please see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39146853.